Total Federal Spending
$89.5B
FY2025 obligations
$89.5B in FY2025 federal spending, $11,619 per capita.
$89.5B total · $11,619 per capita · FY2025 · Ranked #25 total, #46 per capita · 25.7% below national avg
In FY2025, Washington received $89.5B in federal spending - $11,619 per capita, ranking #46 among 57 states and 25.7% below the national average. The most common award type is contracts, accounting for 59.3% of tracked awards. The top spending agency is Social Security Administration.
Washington · FY2025
Washington received $89.5B in federal spending in FY2025 - $11,619 per resident, 25.7% below the national average, with contracts the largest award category.
According to USASpending.gov, the official federal award-transaction dataset, the federal government directed $89.5B to Washington in FY2025, translating to $11,619 per resident across a population of 7,705,281. That per-capita figure is 25.7% below the $15,647 national average and ranks Washington #46 of 57 states per capita, while total-dollar rank is #25, illustrating the difference between volume of federal dollars and intensity of federal dependence.
The award-type mix shows how federal awards break down in Washington by count: 99,739 contracts, 11,809 grants, 6,828 loans, and 46,741 direct payments. The most common award type is contracts at 59.3% of tracked awards in the state, with direct payments a distant second at 46,741 awards. Social Security Administration is the single largest federal agency operating in Washington, with $37.5B in obligations - more than Department of Health and Human Services's $17.7B.
Over the available history, federal spending in Washington has grown 2.8% from $87.1B in FY2020 to $89.5B in FY2025. Combined with 39 counties receiving dollars and top recipient Department of Social && Health Services at $15.8B, this snapshot lets readers judge whether Washington's federal footprint is expanding, stable, or being scaled back relative to FY2025.
It helps to read state totals through two different lenses. Total dollars measure the raw volume of federal money flowing into a state, which naturally favors larger and more populous states. Per-capita spending measures intensity, how much federal money lands per resident, and it surfaces smaller states whose economies lean heavily on federal installations, contracts, or transfer payments. The two rankings often disagree, which is exactly why both appear above. The award mix matters too: contracts signal procurement of goods and services, grants flow to universities, nonprofits, and local governments, and direct payments include programs such as Social Security and Medicare that scale with population. Every figure comes from USASpending.gov, the federal spending-transparency system the U.S. Treasury has operated since the DATA Act of 2014. Federal outlays exceeded $7.0 trillion in fiscal year 2025 (CBO Monthly Budget Review), and these are official government records rather than estimates, though late-posted and corrected awards can adjust a state's totals after the year closes. Our methodology details the per-capita denominator, the award categories, and the data vintage.
Source: USAspending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) + System for Award Management (SAM) Washington federal awards (contracts, grants, loans, direct payments) for FY2025 · 2025 USAspending.gov publishes award-level data within ~30 days of obligation; categories follow OMB Object Class Codes. Per-capita metrics use Census ACS population estimates as the denominator.
Total Spending
$89.5B
Rank #25
Per Capita
$11,619
Rank #46
Population
7,705,281
Contract Awards
99,739
Grant Awards
11,809
Total Federal Spending
$89.5B
FY2025 obligations
Per Capita
$11,619
Rank #46
Counties Receiving
39
federal dollars
Top Agency Share
$37.5B
Social Security Administration
Compared against the national average of $15,647 per resident.
Contracts is the most common award type at 59.3% of tracked awards in Washington (by count, not dollar value).
| Metric | Washington | National Avg | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Per Capita Spending | $11,619 | $15,647 | -25.7% |
| Contracts Share | 0.0% | - | - |
| Grants Share | 0.0% | - | - |
Federal agencies ranked by total spending in Washington during FY2025.
| # | Agency | Spending | % of Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Social Security Administration | $37.5B | 41.9% |
| 2 | Department of Health and Human Services | $17.7B | 19.8% |
| 3 | Department of Defense | $9.1B | 10.1% |
| 4 | Department of Veterans Affairs | $5.6B | 6.2% |
| 5 | Department of Energy | $5.2B | 5.9% |
| 6 | Department of Agriculture | $4.1B | 4.6% |
| 7 | Department of Transportation | $2.8B | 3.1% |
| 8 | Department of Housing and Urban Development | $1.8B | 2.0% |
| 9 | Department of Commerce | $1.7B | 1.9% |
| 10 | Department of Education | $1.6B | 1.8% |
| 11 | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | $806.8M | 0.9% |
Organizations and entities receiving the most federal funds in Washington.
| # | Recipient | Total Awards |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Social && Health Services | $15.8B |
| 2 | The Boeing Company | $4.4B |
| 3 | Commerce, Washington State Department Of | $1.7B |
| 4 | Battelle Memorial Institute | $1.7B |
| 5 | Washington St Department of Transportation | $1.3B |
| 6 | Superintendent of Public Instruction | $1.1B |
| 7 | Bechtel National, INC. | $1.1B |
| 8 | Gciu-Employer Retirement Benefit Plan | $913.5M |
| 9 | University of Washington | $889.1M |
| 10 | Military Department, Washington State | $823.3M |
| 11 | Hanford Tank Waste Operations && Closure, LLC | $796.0M |
| 12 | Washington River Protection Solutions LLC | $775.1M |
| 13 | Blue Origin Washington, LLC | $767.1M |
| 14 | Central Plateau Cleanup Company, LLC | $558.4M |
| 15 | Department of Children, Youth, and Families | $475.2M |
| 16 | Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority | $420.2M |
| 17 | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center | $387.6M |
Federal spending in Washington increased 2.8% from FY2020 to FY2025.
| Fiscal Year | Total Spending | Per Capita | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $89.5B | $11,619 | 7,705,281 |
| FY2024 | $85.2B | $11,058 | 7,705,281 |
| FY2023 | $85.2B | $11,061 | 7,705,281 |
| FY2022 | $79.4B | $10,299 | 7,705,281 |
| FY2021 | $99.4B | $12,896 | 7,705,281 |
| FY2020 | $87.1B | $11,308 | 7,705,281 |
39 counties ranked by federal spending in FY2025.
| # | County | Total Spending | Per Capita | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | King County | $20.7B | $9,117 | 2,269,675 |
| 2 | Pierce County | $7.0B | $7,598 | 921,130 |
| 3 | Benton County | $5.7B | $27,737 | 206,873 |
| 4 | Snohomish County | $4.9B | $5,959 | 827,957 |
| 5 | Spokane County | $4.3B | $7,955 | 539,339 |
| 6 | Kitsap County | $3.8B | $13,725 | 275,611 |
| 7 | Thurston County | $3.5B | $12,033 | 294,793 |
| 8 | Clark County | $3.3B | $6,557 | 503,311 |
| 9 | Yakima County | $1.6B | $6,350 | 256,728 |
| 10 | Whatcom County | $1.6B | $7,105 | 226,847 |
| 11 | Skagit County | $1.3B | $9,714 | 129,523 |
| 12 | Island County | $1.0B | $11,572 | 86,857 |
| 13 | Clallam County | $975.0M | $12,637 | 77,155 |
| 14 | Cowlitz County | $948.2M | $8,563 | 110,730 |
| 15 | Grays Harbor County | $749.8M | $9,913 | 75,636 |
| 16 | Chelan County | $737.3M | $9,324 | 79,074 |
| 17 | Grant County | $721.7M | $7,281 | 99,123 |
| 18 | Lewis County | $700.5M | $8,528 | 82,149 |
| 19 | Mason County | $588.9M | $8,960 | 65,726 |
| 20 | Walla Walla County | $545.3M | $8,713 | 62,584 |
| 21 | Stevens County | $462.1M | $9,950 | 46,445 |
| 22 | Whitman County | $444.3M | $9,262 | 47,973 |
| 23 | Okanogan County | $427.9M | $10,163 | 42,104 |
| 24 | Franklin County | $421.9M | $4,360 | 96,749 |
| 25 | Jefferson County | $418.7M | $12,695 | 32,977 |
| 26 | Kittitas County | $366.2M | $8,259 | 44,337 |
| 27 | Douglas County | $314.9M | $7,334 | 42,938 |
| 28 | Klickitat County | $289.1M | $12,716 | 22,735 |
| 29 | Pacific County | $269.2M | $11,521 | 23,365 |
| 30 | Asotin County | $204.0M | $9,153 | 22,285 |
| 31 | San Juan County | $192.4M | $10,815 | 17,788 |
| 32 | Adams County | $146.5M | $7,105 | 20,613 |
| 33 | Pend Oreille County | $143.9M | $10,737 | 13,401 |
| 34 | Lincoln County | $140.1M | $12,880 | 10,876 |
| 35 | Skamania County | $96.2M | $7,993 | 12,036 |
| 36 | Ferry County | $74.8M | $10,424 | 7,178 |
| 37 | Columbia County | $73.4M | $18,572 | 3,952 |
| 38 | Wahkiakum County | $45.3M | $10,255 | 4,422 |
| 39 | Garfield County | $33.4M | $14,620 | 2,286 |
Go deeper on Washington's federal footprint.
DOGE Impact for Washington
Reported federal contract and grant terminations, claimed savings, per-capita impact, and state ranking.
DOGE state impact →
Per-Capita Rankings
Where Washington ranks among all states for federal spending per resident.
Top Federal Agencies
The agencies that move the most money nationwide, by obligated amount.
Learn more about how federal spending works and how to interpret this data.
Understanding Federal Spending
Contracts, grants, loans, and how federal money flows to states and communities.
Why Spending Varies by State
Military bases, federal labs, population, and per capita analysis.
Where Does Federal Money Go?
Mandatory vs. discretionary, top agencies, and biggest programs.
How Federal Contracts Are Awarded
Procurement process, contract types, and small business set-asides.
States with per capita federal spending closest to Washington's $11,619.
What this means
Washington ranks #46 of 57 states by FY2025 per-capita federal spending.
Per-capita and national-average figures use each state's most recent Census population estimate against the same FY total; they describe HOW money is distributed, not whether that distribution is justified.
Spending figures represent obligated amounts from federal awards. Per capita calculations use Census population estimates. This information is for research and informational purposes only.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and presented.
Every figure on PlainSpending is computed directly from USASpending.gov award-transaction data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every county-level federal award within the state, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.